Employee Perception of Enforced Telework in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic

Natural catastrophes, human-made disasters, or as most recently pandemics can force governments to impose telework for their citizen. With Twitter data from the Covid-19 time, where telework was required in Great Britain for certain periods, we look at employees' experience of telework. Our preliminary results indicate a more positive perception of telework while it was enforced due to Covid-19 restrictions, compared to a regular telework period. In our future research, we plan to deepen the understanding of the employees' topics of concern and to develop a model explaining how enforcement affects their perception of telework. © 2022 Owner/Author.

A new Software Training Model at Belle II

The physics output of modern experimental HEP collaborations hinges not only on the quality of its software but also on the ability of the collaborators to make the best possible use of it. With the COVID-19 pandemic making in-person training impossible, the training paradigm at Belle II was shifted from periodic workshops towards guided self-study. To that end, the study material was rebuilt from scratch as a series of modular and hands-on lessons tightly integrated with the software documentation using Sphinx. Each lesson contains multiple exercises that are supplemented with hints and complete solutions. Rather than duplicating information, students are systematically taught to work with the technical reference documentation to find the important sections for themselves. Unit tests ensure that all examples work with different software versions, and feedback buttons make it easy to submit comments for improvements. © Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd.

Neoadjuvant cemiplimab in patients (pts) with stage II–IV (M0) cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC): Primary analysis of a phase II study

Background: CSCC is highly immune-responsive;a prior pilot study demonstrated a high rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) or major pathologic response (MPR, ≤10% viable tumor), using cemiplimab anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) therapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Here, we present the primary analysis of a confirmatory, open-label, multicenter, Phase 2, single-arm trial of neoadjuvant cemiplimab in pts with resectable Stage II–IV (M0) CSCC. Methods: Pts received cemiplimab 350 mg IV q3W for up to 4 doses before surgery. The primary endpoint was pCR rate per independent central pathologic review (ICPR). Key secondary endpoints included MPR rate per ICPR, objective response rate (ORR;complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) per RECIST v1.1, investigator-assessed pCR and MPR, safety and tolerability. Results: At data cutoff date of 01 Dec 2021, 79 pts were enrolled (67 male;median age 73.0 yrs [range, 66.0–81.0];ECOG performance status 0 (n=60) and 1 (n=19) with stage II (n=5), III (n=38), or IV(M0) (n =36) disease;62 pts received all 4 doses (median number of doses given (Q1:Q3), 4 (4:4);70 pts underwent surgery. The study met its primary endpoint: pCR was observed in 40 (50.6%) pts (95% confidence interval [CI], 39.1–62.1%). MPR was observed in an additional 10 (12.7%) pts (95% CI, 6.2–22.0%). ORR was 68.4% (95% CI, 56.9–78.4) (5 CR, 49 PR, 16 stable disease, 8 progressive disease (PD), 1 non evaluable. Reasons 9 pts did not have surgery: 3 responders declined surgery, 2 lost to follow-up or noncompliance, 2 had inoperable PD, 2 due to AE. Fourteen (17.7%) pts experienced Grade ≥3 AE. Four pts died due to AEs: 1 exacerbation of cardiac failure, 2 myocardial infarctions, and 1 COVID-19 pneumonia. The most common AEs regardless of attribution (all grades) were fatigue (30.4%), rash maculo-papular (13.9%), diarrhea (13.9%) and nausea (13.9%). Conclusions: The pCR + MPR of 63.3% by ICPR in pts with Stage II–IV (M0) CSCC is the highest observed in a multicenter anti-PD-1 neoadjuvant monotherapy study for any solid tumor type. The safety profile of neoadjuvant cemiplimab is consistent with previous anti-PD-1 monotherapy experience. Ongoing follow-up will describe disease-free survival. Clinical trial identification: NCT04154943. Editorial acknowledgement: Medical writing support was provided by John G Facciponte, PhD, of Prime, Knutsford, UK, funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi. Legal entity responsible for the study: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi. Funding: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Sanofi. Disclosure: N. Gross: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: PDS Biotechnology, Shattuck Labs and Genzyme;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: PDS Biotechnology, Shattuck Labs and Genzyme. D.M. Miller: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Castle Biosciences, EMD Serono, Merck KGaA, Merck Sharpe & Dome, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi Genzyme;Financial Interests, Personal, Ownership Interest: Checkpoint Therapeutics;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Kartos Therapeutics, NeoImmune Tech, Inc., Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. N. Khushanlani: Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol Myers Squibb, HUYA Bioscience International, Merck, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Celgene, Amgen;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: EMD Serono, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Genentech, AstraZeneca (data safety monitoring committee), Merck, Array Biopharma, Jounce Therapeutics, Immunocore, Bristol Myers Squibb, HUYA Bioscience International;Financial Interests, Personal, Other, honoraria: Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Mazor Robotics, Amarin, Transenetrix. V. Divi: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Genentech. E.S. Ruiz: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Genentech, Leo Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi;Financial Int rests, Personal, Advisory Role, consulting fees: Genentech, Leo Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors: Checkpoint Therapeutics. E.J. Lipson: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Advisory board and consulting fees: Bristol Myers-Squibb, Eisai, Genentech, Immunocore, Instil Bio, MacroGenics, Merck, Natera, Nektar Therapeutics, Odonate Therapeutics, OncoSec, Pfizer, Rain Therapeutics, Regeneron, Sanofi;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck, Regeneron. F. Meier: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel support, speaker’s fees or advisor’s honoraria: Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Sanofi;Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Novartis and Roche. P.L. Swiecicki: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Ascentage Pharma, Pfizer;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Prelude Therapeutics, Elevar Therapeutics, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals. J.L. Atlas: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi, and Bristol Myers Squibb. J.L. Geiger: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Alkermes, Debio, Merck, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and Roche/Genentech;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Exelixis, Merck and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. A. Hauschild: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Other, Institutional grants, speaker’s honoraria and consultancy fees: Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Provectus and Roche;Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Institutional grants and consultancy fees: EMD Serono, Philogen and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: OncoSec Medical. J.H. Choe: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Exelixis, Coherus Biosciences, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. B.G.M. Hughes: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Pfizer and Roche;Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Amgen. S. Yoo: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. K. Fenech: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. M.D. Mathias: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. H. Han: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. M.G. Fury: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. D. Rischin: Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Genentech, Sanofi, Kura Oncology, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Merck KGaA, Bristol Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, ALX Oncology;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb;Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Bristol Myers Squibb. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

LONG-TERM SAFETY of CANAKINUMAB in PATIENTS with AUTOINFLAMMATORY DISEASES-INTERIM ANALYSIS of the RELIANCE REGISTRY

Background: Autoinfammatory diseases (AID) are characterized by severe systemic and organ infammation as well as high burden of disease for patients and their families. Treatment with the monoclonal antibody canakinumab (CAN), an interleukin-1β inhibitor, has been proven to be safe and effective in clinical trials and real-life. Objectives: The present study explores the long-term efficacy and safety of CAN in routine clinical practice conditions in pediatric (age ≥2 years) and adult patients with CAPS (cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes), FMF (familial Mediterranean fever), TRAPS (tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome) and HIDS/MKD (hyperimmunoglobulinemia D syndrome/meva-lonate kinase defciency). Methods: RELIANCE is a prospective, non-interventional, observational study based in Germany. Patients with clinically confrmed diagnoses of AID routinely receiving CAN are enrolled. Besides efficacy parameters regarding disease activity and remission, safety parameters were recorded at baseline and assessed at 6-monthly intervals. Results: Here, we present the interim analysis of patients with AID (N=199) enrolled in the RELIANCE Registry between October 2017 and December 2021. Mean age in this cohort was 24.4 years (2-79 years) and the proportion of female patients was 53% (N=104). At baseline, median duration of prior CAN treatment was 2 years (0-12 years). A total of 123 patients (62%) experienced any AE (N=653) among which naso-pharyngitis, increase of infammatory markers and pyrexia were the most frequent AE with incidence rates per 100 patient years (IR) of 8.3, 6.2, and 6.2, respectively. 29 patients (15%) were affected by severe AE (SAE, total number N=90) including 11 patients (6%) with SAE suspected to be drug-related (SADR;total number N=30) with IR from 0.2 to 0.7 (Table 1). Overall, 16 AE comprised upper respiratory tract infections (URI). One death (COVID-19, not related) and one malignancy (skin papilloma, not related) were reported. No vertigo and no hyper-sensitivity reactions were observed. N=10 (IR 2.36) vaccination reactions were reported (no SAE). Conclusion: The interim data from the RELIANCE study, the longest running real-life canakinumab registry, confrm safety of long-term canakinumab treatment across the entire study population. A trend for dose-related increase of SAE/SADR requires continuous close monitoring and awareness in patient groups (children, severe phenotypes, certain genotypes) requiring greater than standard dose treatment regimens.

LONG-TERM EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF CANAKINUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH FAMILIAL MEDITERRANEAN FEVER (FMF) - INTERIM ANALYSIS OF THE RELIANCE REGISTRY

Background:Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is characterized by recurrent attacks of fever and serositis as well as elevated inflammatory markers. FMF treatment goals according to EULAR are to control acute attacks and subclinical inflammation and to improve patients´ quality of life1. In a phase 3 pivotal study (CLUSTER study), FMF patients treated with the interleukin-1β inhibitor canakinumab met all these goals2.Objectives:The present study explores the long-term efficacy and safety of canakinumab (CAN) in routine clinical practice in pediatric (age ≥2 years) and adult FMF patients.Methods:RELIANCE is a prospective, non-interventional, multi-center, observational study based in Germany with a three-year follow-up period. Patients with clinically confirmed diagnosis of FMF who routinely receive CAN were enrolled in order to evaluate effectiveness and safety of CAN under standard clinical practice conditions. Disease activity and remission by physicians´ assessment, disease activity, fatigue and impact on social life by patients’ assessment, inflammatory markers and AIDAI (Auto-Inflammatory Diseases Activity Index) score were recorded at baseline and were assessed at 6-monthly intervals within the three-year observation period of the study.Results:This interim analysis of FMF patients (N=54) enrolled by December 2020 includes baseline as well as 6-, 12- and 18-month data. Mean age in this cohort was 25 years (4−56 years) and the proportion of female patients was 46 % (N=25). At baseline, median duration of prior CAN treatment was 2.0 years (0−6 years).While physician ratings report around 62% of patients in disease remission, 52% with absent and 34% with mild-moderate disease activity, patient-reported disease activity decreased from moderate (PPA 3.0) to low (PPA 2.0) during the observation period. A decrease was observed regarding disease activity parameters, in particular in patients without prior CAN therapy (Table 1, Figure 1). A total of 11 serious adverse events was reported, of which one case of tonsillectomy was classified as drug-related.Conclusion:Interim data of FMF patients from the RELIANCE study, the longest running real-life CAN registry, confirm efficacy and safety of long-term CAN treatment.References:[1]Ozen S, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of familial Mediterranean fever. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:644–651. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208690[2]De Benedetti F, et al. Canakinumab for the treatment of autoinflammatory recurrent fever syndromes. N Engl J Med 2018;378:1908–19.Table 1.Baseline characteristics and third interim analysis data of patients with FMFBaseline6 months12 months18 monthsAll patients ;patients without prior CAN therapyNumber of patients, N5411357275163Number (%*) of patients in disease remission (physician assessment)18 (48.6)1 (20.0)19 (73.1)3 (75.0)13 (65.0)1 (50.0)8 (61.5)1 (100.0)Physician Global Assessment, percentage* of absent/mild-moderate/severe rating43/38/110/40/6065/27/050/50/055/35/00/50/046/46/00/100/0Patient assessment of current disease activity;0–10, median (min;max)3.0 (0;10)7.0 (0;10)2.5 (0;7)2.0 (0;5)2.0 (0;7)2.0 (0;2)2.0 (0;6)0.5 (0;1)Patient assessment of current fatigue;0–10, median (min;max)5.0 (0;10)5.0 (0;9)3.5 (0;10)3.0 (1;6)3.0 (0;10)0.0 (0;4)3.0 (0;7)0.5 (0;1)Number (%*) of patients without impairment of social life by the disease19 (46.3)3 (37.5)18 (66.7)3 (75.0)14 (66.7)4 (80.0)5 (55.6)2 (66.7)CRP, median (mg/dl)0.21.10.20.10.20.00.10.5SAA, median (mg/dl)0.76.80.80.40.80.60.60.7ESR, median (mm/h)9.018.56.05.05.54.08.05.0SAENumber of eventsIncidence rate per 100 patient yearsTotal1116.23Arthritis57.38SARS-CoV-2 infection22.95Familial Mediterranean Fever11.48Intestinal Hemorrhage11.48Pyrexia11.48Tonsillectomy (SADR)11.48*not reported for all patientsCRP, c-reactive protein;ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate;n. a., not annotated;SAA, serum amyloid A;SADR, serious adverse drug reaction;SAE, serious adverse eventDisclosure of Interests:Jörg Henes Consultant of: Novartis, AbbVie, Sobi, Roche Janssen, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Roche, J. B. Kuemmerle-Deschner Consultant of: Novartis, AbbVie, Sobi, Grant/research support from: Novartis, AbbVie, Sobi, Tilmann Kallinich Consultant of: Sobi, Novartis, Roche, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Frank Dressler Consultant of: Abbvie, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Frank Weller-Heinemann: None declared, Birgit Kortus-Goetze Consultant of: Novartis, Ivan Foeldvari Consultant of: Novartis, Gerd Horneff Speakers bureau: bbVie, Bayer, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Chugai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Markus Hufnagel Grant/research support from: Novartis, Florian Meier Speakers bureau: Novartis, Julia Weber-Arden Employee of: Novartis, Norbert Blank Consultant of: Novartis, Sobi, Lilly, Pfizer, Abbvie, BMS, MSD, Actelion, UCB, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, Grant/research support from: Novartis, Sobi

Governmental Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Quantitative Ethnographic Comparison of Public Health Authorities’ Communication in Denmark, Norway, and Sweden

The Scandinavian countries are often seen as a unity. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic striking differences on how the countries approached the crisis became evident. This quantitative-ethnographic (QE) study aimed to understand political and cultural similarities and differences between the three Scandinavian countries – Denmark, Norway and Sweden – through their crisis communications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, we focused on how the health authorities of the three countries, in their press releases, treated information about COVID-19 and acted in four fields: reorganization of population behavior, containment of viral transmission, preparation of health systems, and management of socioeconomic impacts. As a methodology, the QE tools nCoder and ENA were applied, respectively: to code the press releases and to correlate the treatment of information with the four fields of action. © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.